![]() ![]() Will post results and conclusions if you guyz want. I'm testing it since this afternoon !!! and my tests are not only benchmrk but a project with 41 tracks and 82 percusiion strip. ![]() Though I've said it before and I'll say it again - I don't think it'd be a wise move for Cakewalk to waste efforts and money developing on the Mac platform. Is it "better"? That's a different story. Is a PC w/ W7 "superior"? Quite probably it seems. No matter how much better that system is in theory - it has failed in it's primary goal - to be transparent, not a source of preoccupation but a simple mean. Now, as a musician, if I end up thinking statistics, something's not working as it should. As far as I'm concerned, the proof is in the pudding - I, as a Mac user, am thinking music. All the computer talk is a thing of the past - I'm a musician again. In fact, I've never cared less about benchmarks, statistics, graphics and curves. Reciving a MBP 17 I7 2760qm tomorow specialy for stress test versus my hp elitebook, the winner will stay !Īnd in spite of it all, I've never been happier making music on a computer than since I've made the switch. 40 tracks including tsar eq of differnce each time !! cause Windows is better for audio than osx. So even i soanr mac will exists and even if i own a mac, i will use it under windows like all other software. witch is like skipping the os polution !! This translate osx bad dpc latency : os polution of cpu's ! yes mac +PT on studios but they use HD and DSP card : translation : dedicated cpu. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |